Bernard Hopkins

*** FLASHBACK – this article originally appeared on dmboxing.com on October 21, 2008

Hopkins

By David Martinez / Boxing Historian

I spoke to many boxing experts prior to the recent Bernard Hopkins vs. Kelly Pavlik light heavyweight fight and the answer to my question who would win – was the same … the undefeated middleweight champion Pavlik will win!


Las Vegas had the odds at 4 to 1 for Pavlik, and with the exception of boxing expert Johnny Ortiz who picked Hopkins to win, I had a hard time finding anyone that would think otherwise.

At age 43 years old, Hopkins is a rare breed and is certainly not to be under estimated by any means in boxing. His win over the 26 year old Palvlik was nothing less that spectacular – I had him winning every round but one (the 9th) in his brilliant 12 round unanimous decision.

To put it in a better perspective, here’s where a few great fighters of the past were at the age of 43 years old in their careers. I don’t want to take anything away from their greatness, but my intent is to illustrate where they were in their careers at the same age time frame as Hopkins is today.

The greatest fighter, my opinion, Sugar Ray Robinson was losing a 10 round decision to Joey Giardello … Archie Moore was being knocked out by Floyd Patterson … Joe Louis was being knockout six years prior to his 43rd birthday by Rocky Marciano.

At 43 years old, George Foreman lost a decision to an undefeated Evander Holyfield and although he literally took father time back by winning the heavyweight champiuonship two months shy of his 47th birthday – probably was the exception to the rule in past eras.

In boxing, I have always contended that once you are past your 39th birthday you should retire for the sake of the sport, not to mention your personal health as a fighter … Bernard Hopkins is truly the classic case of today’s modern era boxers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *